Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Carousel with three slides shown at a time. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate three slides at a time, or the slide dot buttons at the end to jump three slides at a time. PE1000 Sheet
Anton S. Tremsin, John Rakovan, … Sven C. Vogel
Alberto Cereser, Markus Strobl, ... Søren Schmidt
Saverio Braccini, Pierluigi Casolaro, ... Paola Scampoli
Jie Liu, Haoyu Jiang, … Guohui Zhang
Jennifer A. Shusterman, Nicholas D. Scielzo, ... Anton P. Tonchev
T. Straume, G. Rugel, … C. Wallner
Jing Wang, Mychailo B. Toloczko, … Jiandong Zhang
Michael C. Hamel, J. Kyle Polack, … Sara A. Pozzi
Riina Virta, Tatiana A. Bubba, ... Peter Dendooven
Scientific Reports volume 12, Article number: 6648 (2022 ) Cite this article
Tools for three-dimensional elemental characterization are available on length scales ranging from individual atoms, using electrons as a probe, to micrometers with X-rays. However, for larger volumes up to millimeters or centimeters, quantitative measurements of elemental or isotope densities were hitherto only possible on the surface. Here, a novel quantitative elemental characterization method based on energy-resolved neutron imaging, utilizing the known neutron absorption cross sections with their ‘finger-print’ absorption resonance signatures, is demonstrated. Enabled by a pixilated time-of-flight neutron transmission detector installed at an intense short-pulsed spallation neutron source, for this demonstration 3.25 million state-of-the-art nuclear physics neutron transmission analyses were conducted to derive isotopic densities for five isotopes in 3D in a volume of 0.25 cm3. The tomographic reconstruction of the isotope densities provides elemental maps similar to X-ray microprobe maps for any cross section in the probed volume. The bulk isotopic density of a U-20Pu-10Zr-3Np-2Am nuclear transmutation fuel sample was measured, agrees well with mass-spectrometry and is evidence of the accuracy of the method.
Characterizing the elemental composition of materials is of great interest in scientific disciplines ranging from mineralogy to energy materials. Well established methods like X-ray fluorescence1 provide elemental compositions on the surface and methods such as laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry2 allow isotopic concentration measurements on the surface. Knowledge of the three-dimensional elemental concentration is desirable in many cases and electron- and X-ray based methods were developed for nanometer3 and micrometer4,5 length scales. Destructive methods, analyzing nanometer scale volumes by removing atom by atom, also exist6. All of these techniques require significant sample preparation. While millimeter to centimeter scale 3D visualizations of cracks and average attenuation, without elemental sensitivity, is provided by hard X-ray7,8 or thermal neutron tomography9, a method for three-dimensional element or isotope density measurements on millimeter or centimeter length-scales was hitherto missing.
Here, a novel quantitative method is presented based on energy-resolved neutron imaging, utilizing the known neutron absorption cross sections with their ‘finger-print’ absorption resonance signatures. First measurements by Sato et al. showed that neutron absorption resonance spectroscopy with computer tomography can non-destructively provide nuclide density inside an object by analyzing transmitted intensities at absorption resonance energies for specific isotopes10. In this first approach, applicability of the method was limited due to only few projections recorded with low spatial resolution, i.e. 2.3 mm provided by a 64 (8 × 8) pixel 6Li-glass scintillation counter. However, the authors alluded to the potential for quantitative elemental analysis. Utilizing more advanced detector technology, state-of-the-art hardware and software solutions we report, based on 3.25 million state-of-the-art nuclear physics neutron transmission analyses, isotopic densities for five isotopes in 3D in a volume of 0.25 cm3. The method presented in this work is enabled by a pixilated time-of-flight (ToF) neutron transmission detector11 with 512 × 512 pixels and a pixel size of 55 × 55 μm2 installed at an intense short-pulsed spallation neutron source12. Like similar non-isotope specific neutron techniques, the method does not require sample preparation and works with hazardous samples enclosed in containers.
Energy-resolved neutron imaging is often applied to the cold or thermal neutron energy range to gain crystallographic or phase information via Bragg-edge imaging methods13,14,15,16. In this energy range, the attenuation of neutrons by most isotopes is dominated by elastic scattering, limiting the capability for extracting densities reliably, particularly if the material contains multiple elements or the crystals have a preferred orientation (texture). In contrast, utilizing neutron absorption resonances as unique ‘finger-prints’ of isotopes in the epithermal neutron energy range allows to reliably determine the 2D areal-density distribution of isotopes with suitable resonances that can be resolved with the energy resolution provided at the instrument. This is independent of the atomic arrangement, i.e. crystal structure, of the atoms and of the microstructure of the material, i.e. texture, phase fractions etc. Well-developed neutron cross section analysis implemented in state-of-the-art neutron transmission data analysis codes17,18 allows to determine the areal densities of multiple isotopes simultaneously, including considerations such as self-attenuation or resonance interference described by the Reich–Moore formalism19. At a short-pulse neutron source, such as the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE)12, pixilated time-of-flight neutron detectors11 enable therefore three-dimensional isotope density measurements as the number of nuclei of a given isotope can be measured per voxel using tomographic data-sets. Previous research has also estimated the isotope density in two dimensional radiographs20,21, and alluded to the potential of this technique22,23. However, the massive amount of neutron transmission analyses for each pixel recorded in a tomography dataset consisting of several tens or hundreds of rotations, strategies for proper background treatment to obtain reliable results and other obstacles have prevented full development of this intriguing technique. With this work, we demonstrate that three-dimensional isotope density measurements are possible with energy-resolved neutron imaging.
Using energy-resolved neutron imaging, a U-20Pu-10Zr-3Np-2Am (weight percent) sample, an alloy researched for transmutation nuclear fuels24, was characterized to obtain the bulk composition for comparison with mass-spectrometry. The sample consisted of a 20 mm long, 4.2 mm diameter U-20Pu-10Zr-3Np-2Am (weight percent) cast fuel slug contained in a double-walled steel container. The sample was prepared at Idaho National Laboratory where also mass spectrometry was performed (Table 1). The sample was mounted on a rotation stage and energy-resolved neutron imaging data was collected for 120 min per rotation for 65 rotations.
Considering only an active-area on the detector from pixels where the neutron beam traversed the sample volume (Fig. 1A), 50,000 (125 × 400) pixels required neutron transmission data analysis per sample rotation, resulting in 3.25 million total transmission-spectra fits. The SAMMY code17 was used with cross section data for the isotopes 237Np, 238U, 239Pu, 240Pu, and 241Am obtained from the ENDF/B-VIII.0 data base25. For conventional neutron transmission measurements, the sample is generally several tens of meters away from the detector, such that sample induced background can be neglected26. In contrast, for imaging measurements, the sample position is as close as possible to the detector to reduce blurring resulting from the divergent beam. However, this sample position impacts the background in imaging applications and therefore the sample induced background needed to be properly accounted for to obtain reliable areal and volumetric densities. To accomplish this, a Ta foil was mounted on the detector window with a thickness of 100 μm, leading to opaque resonances. This allowed for reliable determination of the background, including sample contributions, by the transmission values at the bottom of these resonance dips in the transmission data.
Thermal neutron radiograph (A) with single pixel data for isotope concentration measurement with a fit of the transmission data inside (B) and outside (C) the sample. Arrows mark the resonances of several isotopes and the difference curves between experimental data and fit are shown below.
Figure 1 shows an example of the data analysis for single pixels with fitted transmission for a pixel within the slug in (B) and outside the slug in (C). The total computing time for the data analysis of the tomographic data-set processing 3.25 million spectra on a desktop PC using 64 × 2.4 GHz CPUs was 16 days. The bulk composition was determined from the average density of the reconstructed sample volume. Table 1 shows the comparison of the results with the results of the mass spectrometry. The maximum discrepancy for the four isotopes except 238U is 0.08 g/cm3, establishing the reliability of this method. The reason for the discrepancy of 1.8 g/cm3 for 238U lays in the properties of the 238U resonance in the dataset. The analyzed energy range of 0.2–9 eV only provided a single 238U absorption resonance at 6.67 eV. At a fractional density of ~ 9 g/cm3 and cross sections ≫ 103 barn, this led to insufficient non-zero transmission at resonance energies for a reliable data fit. Furthermore, the absorption resonance at 6.67 eV for 238U has a comparatively broad profile with respect to the other isotopes present and the resonance overlaps significantly in the non-zero transmission range with other resonances. Increasing the energy range to include more 238U resonances for the analysis could mitigate this problem but was not feasible with the available resources for all 3.25 million datasets.
Additionally, It should be noted that despite some absorption reasonances providing broader profiles than others, e.g. 239Pu provided the broadest and most opaque resonance, accuracy in isotope concentration or quality of reconstruction was not heavily impacted by the resonance widths of the different isotopes present in this sample. This can be explained by the proportionality between integrated area for the attenuation by a specific resonance and the number of atoms for the specific isotope in the beam path remaining intact despite broadening. Therefore, as long as the absorption resonances can be measured with a sufficiently large number of time-bins for proper profile fitting and are not severely overlapped by resonances from other isotopes, the impact of energy resolution on the accuracy of the isotope quantification is negligible. These two conditions are of course affected by the time resolution of the detector system (several µs in our case27) as well as by the energy resolution of the pulsed source utilized (e.g. the initial proton pulse width producing spallation neutrons should be negligible relative to the moderation time).
The large absorption cross section for thermal neutrons of 239Pu made it impossible to utilize thermal neutrons for neutron tomography. Using the sample composition, the computed transmission at a thickness of 4.2 mm for 25 meV neutrons equates to 3.5%. For such opaque samples, the reconstruction leads to artefacts of the average voxel density, so-called ‘beam hardening’28. However, at epithermal neutron energies (E > 0.4 eV) the cross section drops such that significant fractions of the beam are transmitted and a reliable tomographic reconstruction is possible. Figure 2 shows a 3D rendering of the fuel slug resulting from neutron tomography by selecting time-of-flight neutrons only at the upper end of the thermal spectrum, with energies ranging from 0.1 to 0.2 eV. Several globular features are apparent. The tomographic reconstruction of the densities of the aforementioned isotopes allowed further investigation of these features and greatly reduced densities for all isotopes were found at the locations of the globular features. This would indicate that the features are either casting voids or Zr-rich metallic inclusions (Zr did not provide neutron absorption resonances in the 0.2–9 eV energy range used for the measurements). With the slices of the tomographic reconstruction providing data similar to elemental maps provided by X-ray microprobe, but within the bulk of a sample, non-destructively, and for samples that have to be in containers such as nuclear fuels, this characterization guides destructive examination by identifying where this sample should be cut for further investigations.
Volumetric reconstruction using epithermal neutrons of the U-20Pu-10Zr-3Np-2Am sample with indicated region in red for CT slices of the volumetric densities of individual isotopes. Slices normal to the cylinder axis in (A) with corresponding isotope densities shown in (B) and slices parallel to the cylinder axis in (C) with corresponding isotope densities shown in (D), respectively.
In summary, three-dimensional quantitative isotope density measurements on cm3 sized volumes with sub-mm spatial resolution were demonstrated with the results in agreement to prior measurements using mass spectrometry. This technique extends the range of available elemental or isotope-density measurement techniques to the mm length scale. At present, applications include characterization of fresh and irradiated nuclear fuels (as demonstrated here), dopant concentrations of large crystals for scintillator applications21, fission gas pressure measurements29 and measurements of isotope-specific ion uptake from aqueous solutions into concrete30. All of these rely on the sample containing elements with suitable neutron absorption resonances for this technique. A combination of a short-pulsed neutron source with a pixilated time-of-flight neutron imaging detector and massive data analysis runs with state-of-the-art nuclear physics analysis code enabled this unique capability.
Artefacts, such as beam hardening, for samples that attenuate the beam significantly over a large energy range, can be eliminated by the presented technique, requiring only a subset of neutron energies that provide significant non-zero transmission for the SAMMY code17 to determine accurate areal densities. This has been illustrated in this work in the case of 239Pu, providing accurate reconstruction despite significant attenuation of the beam by the 239Pu absorption resonances.
Accurate determination of isotopic densities with the presented approach relies on multiple aspects, such as number and cross-section of absorption resonances for a given isotope, overlap of absorption resonances of different isotopes and last but not least the flux of neutrons at the specific energies. Additionally, while not only the flux for epithermal neutrons using a moderated source decreases with increasing neutron energy, the detection efficiency of the deployed detector also significantly reduces based on the 10B capture efficiency for epithermal neutrons27. This limits this technique at present to absorption resonances below 100 eV for tomographic measurements due to the significant increase in acquisition time for absorption resonances at higher energies.
A recent development in scintillator-based neutron detection31 offers new perspectives for the presented technique and could overcome some of the limitations with the detector deployed in this work. This new development provides a neutron counting principle based on a detector that offers a variable field of view (roughly 1 × 1 cm2 to 20 × 20 cm2) and interchangeable scintillators. For example, utilizing thick scintillators would allow to significantly increase detection efficiency compared to the 10B doped sensor11,27, particularly benefiting the epithermal neutron regime. Furthermore, a major challenge in the presented work was the determination of the background, which is predominantly caused by gamma contributions. Neutron/gamma discrimination enabled by this novel technique would therefore allow to suppress such background31. Extending the accessible energy range with an improved background would significantly enlarge the potential applications of the presented technique by allowing to access a larger number of isotopes with resonances at higher neutron energies than presently accessible. Software improvements, e.g. to identify isotopes present in the spectra based on a library of cross-sections and further improving background subtraction are on-going.
The method described here offers potential in any field where at present techniques, such as inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), are applied for isotope analysis with isotopes that exhibit neutron absorption resonances and samples of at least a few millimeters in size. The technique described here would increase the probed volume by orders of magnitude as well as provide a spatial distribution of the isotopes. The neutron-based technique complements X-ray or electron-based micrometer resolution techniques for elemental identification, allowing e.g. to identify regions of interest in cubic centimeters of irradiated nuclear fuel during advanced fuel development. While ordering processes in alloys occur on tens of nanometer length scales, e.g. leading to characteristic lamellar microstructures, will not be accessible with this technique, larger length scale processes such as during fractional solidification in alloy casting, geoscience applications or molten salts like NaCl-UCl3 mixtures could be characterized with the technique described here. For nuclear applications, including nuclear forensics, the ability to distinguish between fissile 235U and 238U goes beyond what X-ray and electron-based methods offer and has the advantage over mass-spectrometry that the characterization can be accomplished with the sample sealed inside shielding containers.
Finally, while limited at the present time to large-scale pulsed neutron user facilities, the potential of laser-driven short pulse intense neutron sources32,33 may provide this technique at other facilities within a decade.
At the pulsed spallation neutron source at LANSCE, 270 ns long (base-to-base) pulses of 800 MeV protons from a linear accelerator and proton storage ring produce neutron bursts at 20 Hz which are subsequently moderated. Collimation consisted of steel and borated polyethylene rings increasing from 2 cm inner diameter to 5 cm over a total length of 150 cm with a distance of ~ 750 cm from the smallest diameter of the collimator to the sample (see34 for more details on the beam line). The neutrons in each pulse arrive at the detector sorted by their energy, with higher energy neutrons arriving first. The time-of-flight from the moderator to the detector allows with the calibrated distance between moderator and detector to compute the velocity and kinetic energy of the neutron35. Tabulated neutron interaction cross sections are available in databases such as ENDF36. Many isotopes, especially isotopes heavier than ~ Zr, exhibit sharp increases in their neutron absorption cross section for specific neutron energies, so-called neutron absorption resonances37,38,39. Similar to optical spectroscopy, where an element can be identified by its optical emission or absorption spectrum, neutron resonance spectroscopy allows to identify isotopes present in transmission spectra by means of neutron resonance transmission analysis40. The neutron transmission T for neutrons of energy E is given by
whereby Is(E) is the intensity transmitted through the sample, Ibs(E) the background with sample in beam, Io(E) the incident or open beam intensity and Ibo(E) the background for the open beam. All of these intensities vary for each pixel of a 2D detector and therefore need to be measured pixel by pixel. In the exponent, the sum is running over each isotope present in the sample, with ni the areal density of the ith isotope, and σi(E) the cross section of the ith isotope for neutrons of energy E26,41. For the purpose of isotope density measurements, the cross section is assumed to be known, leaving the areal density as the only variable during the analysis using the SAMMY code17. This analysis has to be performed for each pixel of the detector where the sample is visible. In our case, a detector consisting of a multi-channel plate and a MediPix readout chip was utilized11 to record ~ 3000 frames per 50 ms pulse of the neutron source with a pixel size of 55 μm. The field of view is 512 × 512 pixels or 28.16 × 28.16 mm2.
Errors in the transmission spectra for each pixel as shown in Fig. 1B,C were determined based on Poisson counting statistics for each pixel, i.e. sqrt(I) where I is the intensity. Each particle that is detected by the sensor activates on average ~ 4 pixels, incrementing the activated pixels by 1 grey-value. Individual frames corresponding to different time-of-flight were integrated for the duration of the experiment. For each frame, event overlap (pixel dead time) was negligible. Therefore, as an approximation, the total number of particles measured for each frame and pixel was assumed ~ 1/4 of the measured grey-value. Finally, applying error propagation to Eq. (1), absolute errors for the transmission values T(E) were determined.
Beckhoff, B., Kanngießer, B., Langhoff, N., Wedell, R. & Wolff, H. Handbook of Practical X-ray Fluorescence Analysis (Springer Science & Business Media, 2007).
Durrant, S. F. Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: Achievements, problems, prospects. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 14, 1385–1403 (1999).
Kelly, T. F. & Miller, M. K. Atom probe tomography. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 31101 (2007).
De Samber, B. et al. Three-dimensional elemental imaging by means of synchrotron radiation micro-XRF: Developments and applications in environmental chemistry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 390, 267–271 (2008).
Kanngießer, B., Malzer, W. & Reiche, I. A new 3D micro X-ray fluorescence analysis set-up—First archaeometric applications. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 211, 259–264 (2003).
Miller, M. K. Atom Probe Tomography: Analysis at the Atomic Level (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).
Baruchel, J., Buffiere, J.-Y. & Maire, E. X-ray Tomography in Material Science. (Hermes science publications, Paris, France, 2000).
Cnudde, V. & Boone, M. N. High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in geosciences: A review of the current technology and applications. Earth-Sci. Rev. 123, 1–17 (2013).
Strobl, M. et al. Advances in neutron radiography and tomography. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 42, 243001 (2009).
Sato, H., Kamiyama, T. & Kiyanagi, Y. Pulsed neutron imaging using resonance transmission spectroscopy. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2009.01.124 (2009).
Tremsin, A. S., Feller, W. B. & Downing, R. G. Efficiency optimization of microchannel plate (MCP) neutron imaging detectors. I. Square channels with 10B doping. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2004.09.028 (2005).
Lisowski , PW , Bowman , CD , Russell , GJ & Wender , SA The Los Alamos National Laboratory spallation neutron sources .Nucl.Sci.Eng.106, 208–218 (1990).
Woracek, R. et al. Neutron Bragg-edge-imaging for strain mapping under in situ tensile loading. J. Appl. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3582138 (2011).
Woracek, R., Santisteban, J., Fedrigo, A. & Strobl, M. Diffraction in neutron imaging—A review. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accelerators Spectrom. Detectors Assoc. Equip. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2017.07.040 (2018).
Tran, K. V. et al. Spectral neutron tomography. Mater. Today Adv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2021.100132 (2021).
Watanabe, K. et al. Cross-sectional imaging of quenched region in a steel rod using energy-resolved neutron tomography. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers, Detect. Assoc. Equip. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2019.162532 (2019).
Larson, N. M. Updated Users’ Guide for SAMMY Multilevel R-matrix Fits to Neutron Data Using Bayes’ Equation. (1998).
Moxon, M. C., Ware, T. C. & Dean, C. J. REFIT-2009 A Least-Square Fitting Program for Resonance Analysis of Neutron Transmission. Capture, Fission Scatt. Data Users’ Guid. REFIT-2009-10 (UKNSFP243, 2010) (2010).
Reich, C. W. & Moore, M. S. Multilevel formula for the fission process. Phys. Rev. 111, 929–933 (1958).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Festa, G. et al. Neutron resonance transmission imaging for 3D elemental mapping at the ISIS spallation neutron source. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 30, 745–750 (2015).
Tremsin, A. S. et al. Real-time crystal growth visualization and quantification by energy-resolved neutron imaging. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–10 (2017).
Kai, T. et al. Visibility estimation for neutron resonance absorption radiography using a pulsed neutron source. Phys. Procedia 43, 111–120 (2013).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Hasemi, H. et al. Evaluation of nuclide density by neutron resonance transmission at the NOBORU instrument in J-PARC/MLF. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers, Detect. Assoc. Equip. 773, 137–149 (2015).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Janney, D. E. & Papesch, C. A. FCRD Transmutation Fuels Handbook 2015. Idaho National Laboratory report number INL/EXT-15-36520. https://doi.org/10.2172/1239879 (2015).
Brown, D. A. et al. ENDF/B-VIII. 0: The 8th major release of the nuclear reaction data library with CIELO-project cross sections, new standards and thermal scattering data. Nucl. Data Sheets 148, 1–142 (2018).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Schillebeeckx, P. et al. Determination of resonance parameters and their covariances from neutron induced reaction cross section data. Nucl. Data Sheets 113, 3054–3100 (2012).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Tremsin, A. S. et al. Detection efficiency, spatial and timing resolution of thermal and cold neutron counting MCP detectors. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers, Detect. Assoc. Equip. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2009.01.041 (2009).
Zawisky, M., Bastürk, M., Rehacek, J. & Hradil, Z. Neutron tomographic investigations of boron-alloyed steels. J. Nucl. Mater. 327, 188–193 (2004).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Tremsin, A. S., et al. Non-contact measurement of partial gas pressure and distribution of elemental composition using energy-resolved neutron imaging. AIP Advances 7.1, 015315 (2017).
Losko, A. S. et al. Separation of uptake of water and ions in porous materials using energy resolved neutron imaging. JOM. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-020-04101-y (2020).
Losko, A. S. et al. New perspectives for neutron imaging through advanced event-mode data acquisition. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00822-5 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fernández, J. C. et al. Laser-plasmas in the relativistic-transparency regime: Science and applications. Phys. Plasmas 24, 56702 (2017).
Zimmer, M. et al. Demonstration of non-destructive and isotope-sensitive material analysis using a short-pulsed laser-driven epi-thermal neutron source. Nat. Commun. 13.1, 1–11 (2022).
Mocko, M., Muhrer, G. & Tovesson, F. Advantages and limitations of nuclear physics experiments at an ISIS-class spallation neutron source. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers, Detect. Assoc. Equip. 589, 455–464 (2008).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Windsor, C. G. Pulsed Neutron Scattering (Taylor & Francis, 1981).
Chadwick, M. B. ENDF nuclear data in the physical, biological, and medical sciences. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 88, 10–14 (2012).
Bohr, N. Neutron capture and nuclear constitution. Nature 137, 344–348 (1936).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Breit, G. & Wigner, E. Capture of slow neutrons. Phys. Rev. 49, 519 (1936).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Lamb, W. E. Capture of neutrons by atoms in a crystal. Phys. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.55.190 (1939).
Postma, H., Perego, R. C., Schillebeeckx, P., Siegler, P. & Borella, A. Neutron resonance capture analysis and applications. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 271, 95–99 (2007).
Harvey, J. Experimental Neutron Resonance Spectroscopy (Elsevier, 2012).
We gratefully acknowledge funding from the DOE/NE Fuel Cycle R&D program and provision of the sample material described here by Dr. R. Fielding, Idaho National Laboratory. We are indebted to Drs. K.J. McClellan (LANL) and M.A.M. Bourke for encouragement and valuable discussion as well as Dr. A.S. Tremsin (UC Berkeley) for technical support with the detector during the period of this project. This work has benefitted from the use of the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE) at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos National Laboratory is operated by Triad National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract number 89233218NCA000001.
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA
A. S. Losko & S. C. Vogel
Research neutron source Heinz Maier-Leibnitz, 85748, Garching, Germany
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
A.S.L. and S.C.V. conceived and conducted the experiments, performed the data-analysis and wrote the manuscript.
Correspondence to A. S. Losko.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Losko, A.S., Vogel, S.C. 3D isotope density measurements by energy-resolved neutron imaging. Sci Rep 12, 6648 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10085-3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10085-3
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
Scientific Reports (Sci Rep) ISSN 2045-2322 (online)
Customized UHMWPE Sheets Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.